The Professor Mick Marchington Research Grant

Current recipients of the Marchington Research Grant are:

Awarded 2024

Kristin Hildenbrand, University of Shefield. Stressed Out or Hyped Up? A diary study exploring the impact of the line managers’ and employees’ stress mindsets on anticipatory workload, line managerial behaviour, and employee well-being.

Derin Kent, Warwick Business School. Testing the Edge: How Emergency Services Workers Engage with Risky Scenarios.

Franz Mönke, University of Münster. Toward a Better Understanding of the (In) Validity of Cybervetting

Awarded 2023

Dr Catherine Mackintosh, University of the West of England. The retention of older nurses via individualised working arrangements: A qualitative research project examining the formation and functioning of fair idiosyncratic deals.

Dr Wei Wei, University of Oxford. Actors and social contexts in digital human resource management: A comparative study of the financial sector in China and the UK.

Dr Helen C. Williams, Swansea University Prifysgol Abertawe. Negotiating difference at work: Exploring experiences of intersectional disadvantage in UK small and medium enterprises.

Awarded 2022

Dr David Cross, University of Southampton. Do? Should? Could? Investigating the relationship between HR practice and the self-employed.

Dr Anastasios Hadjisolomou, University of Strathclyde. Re-examining the role of line manager in managing sickness absence during and post pandemic and the issue of legitimacy of sickness: Informing policy and practice for a fairer workplace.

Dr Emma Hughes, University of Liverpool. How do front-line managers navigate and enact HRM in practice?

Applications should be submitted to kx@cipd.co.uk no later than 23:59 on 22nd January 2025. 

The application includes: 

• Completed form (required) 
• Narrative CV for the PI (required) 
• Details of any other people in the research team and their role and/or activities they will undertake (optional) 

Professor Mick Marchington had a highly influential career advancing knowledge to improve HR and employment relations. He was dedicated to linking research and practice. He was a longstanding contributor to CIPD expertise and a friend and supporter. Following his passing in 2021 we set up the Professor Mick Marchington Applied Research Grant in memory of his dedication and contributions.

Over many years, as well as publishing highly influential research and inspiring many students, he helped develop CIPD’s professional standards, qualifications and academic membership and was a lead examiner and quality panel chair accrediting CIPD centres. He championed research skills as part of professional development, and his learned yet practical writing argued for progressive people management that supports better working lives. Mick’s textbook, HRM at Work has long been a bestseller.

His numerous contributions led to him being made a CIPD Chartered Companion in 2003 and his friendship with and active commitment to the CIPD continued right up to his death. Mick will be remembered for his insight, gravitas, warmth, humour and undimmed dedication to the HR profession and the world of work. 

We are delighted to provide the Professor Mick Marchington Applied Research Grant with the support of his family. The grant’s focus on supporting early career academics is very much in line with Mick’s personal values and the support he gave to the next generation of researchers.

To minimise biases the applications will be blind reviewed, and CVs will have names or other identifiers removed.  

We ask for narrative CVs to promote equality.  Guidance on how to write a narrative CV can be found through UKRI here   

The PI should make up the majority of time applied for. Aside from the PI, there may be others in the research team. In this instance, the PI should submit an additional supporting document detailing the full research team with an explanation of the roles they will undertake. These should be named where possible, but we recognise that (for example) research assistants may not yet be recruited.    

Each eligible application will be reviewed by two expert academics and one practitioner.  Up to 6 applications will be shortlisted for virtual interviews.

Applications will be judged on :

• How relevant the proposed topic is to the profession and the contemporary world of work.
• Whether the proposal addressed a clear gap in the research or knowlege base.
• Whether the research methods are appropriate for the question and likely to be conducted robustly.
• Whether there are clear lessons/insights for practice.
• How well planned and appropriately resourced the project is. 
• Whether there is good value for money and a high likelihood of successful completion. 

The topics for the Professor Mick Marchington Research Grant 2025 are:

• The evolving demands and/or wellbeing of the people profession: HR, L&D and organisational development.  
• Recruitment & retention- inclusion, attraction, collaboration, roles, technology and wellbeing 
• Organisational culture - sectoral employment flexibility, lifelong learning, degrees of performance and inclusion 

The principal investigator (PI) must be an early career researcher. This includes doctoral researchers, those immediately postdoctoral and those transitioning to independent researcher. In line with guidelines from UK Research and Innovation (UKRI), we do not apply strict criteria, such as number of years since PhD, but ask applicants to explain why they should be considered early career. 

Applicants can be based in any geographical location.  However, there is an expectation that winners will be able to attend CIPD events in person (unless prevented by personal circumstances) to share their ideas and findings with practitioners. 

The PI should make up the majority of time applied for. Aside from the PI, there may be others in the research team; these should be named where possible, but we recognise that research assistants may not yet be recruited.

Costs may be used for any primary or secondary research activity, including researcher time and direct costs. Any research methods and activities are valid: for example, costs may be used to review literature, collect data, or conduct analysis. Eligible direct costs may include, for example, running a survey, transcription, travel, equipment or specialised software. All costs should be clearly explained and justified.

The grant must be used for original research activity (primary or secondary research). Although we expect practical outputs (see below), pure ‘knowledge exchange’ or ‘translational research’ activity aimed at disseminating existing research is not sufficient to be eligible.

The grant must cover activity which is not already funded, but we encourage it to be used in conjunction with other sources of funding – for example, joint or matched funding from a university employer. This may help cover researcher time or any other resources. We encourage applicants to acknowledge any such support they will receive from their university or other funders and to identify the financial or equivalent value.

On completion of the project a short research summary must be submitted to the CIPD.  

This must: 

• Be written in accessible and engaging language.
• Explain technical detail in non-specialist terms.
• Use references or appendices to minimise technical detail in the core text.
• Give particular emphasis to discussing the rationale and importance of the research and the implications or recommendations for practice. 

We also encourage applicants to propose other specific outputs that will meet the needs of different stakeholders or target audiences (e.g. policy briefings, practice guides, blogs, podcasts).  

These may be published by the CIPD where it aligns with current agendas or activity. Research should be completed within two years of the signing of contracts. 

Contracts will be with the employing universities with payment upon approval by the university ethics panel. At set-up, we will agree with the principal investigator a timeline of deliverables and check-in progress meetings at key points in the research.

Other than those described above, we do not offer associated benefits as standard. If additional support is required (such as channels to help recruit research participants), this should be specified and justified in the proposal. Requests will be considered on the basis of alignment with CIPD agendas or current activity.